Your actions and utterances profoundly influence your patient’s replies
- How we ask questions affects the quality and quantity of information received
- By the nature of our (closed) questions, we impose limits to our patient’s freedom to elaborate
Appropriately move from open to closed interviewing
- Open (divergent):
- Introduce an area of enquiry without unduly focusing the content of the response
- Still direct your patient, but allow the patient more discretion in their answer while suggesting that elaboration is welcome
- ‘Tell me about your headaches’
- Closed (convergent):
- Specific, often one-word answers are elicited
- Limit the response to a narrow field
- ‘Do you ever wake up with headaches in the morning?’
The Open-to-Closed Cone
- Starting with open techniques and moving to closed questions later on
- Initially, open techniques: obtain a picture of the problem from your patient’s perspective
- Increasingly specific, though still open
- Closed questions: elicit additional details
- Experienced practitioners utilize multiple open-to-closed cones throughout the interview
The Advantages of Open Questioning Techniques
- Encourage your patient to tell their story in a more complete fashion
- Allow you time and space to listen and think (not just prepare the next question)
- Contribute to more effective diagnostic reasoning
- Reduces “tunnel vision” and premature narrowing of enquiry
- Aid in the exploration of both the disease and illness frameworks
- Allow for increased patient participation (rather than physician domination)
Exercise: Using open-ended questions allows your patient freedom in telling their narrative. How might you handle a patient who cannot remain focused on the narrative and often becomes side-tracked?
Silverman, J., Kurtz, S., & Draper, J. (2013). Skills for Communicating with Patients (Thrid Edit). London: Radcliffe Publishing.